Sunday, May 26, 2024
Power Palace Gym Ad
HomeOpinionEditorialsExposing Liars: How the Newberg Equity in Education Cult Harassed School Board...

Exposing Liars: How the Newberg Equity in Education Cult Harassed School Board Directors In Their Private Lives

Kristen Stoller, a leader in Newberg Equity in Education, is trying to use lies to hide the truth about her groups' organized harassment and evil activities against school board chair Dave Brown.

- Advertisement -
Subscribe to Yamhill Advocate

This article will be an editorial, as I will share some of my opinions on the communications in order to provide some further context to them. All of the legal disclaimers from my previous articles apply to this article, too.

I am not an attorney and my comments shouldn’t be regarded as legal advice. They are, however, my opinion based on my interpretation of the laws and backed by the evidence I have shown in this article.

By the way,

If you wish to contribute to my legal defense fund (as the people I have been exposing have threatened lawsuits against me), you can click here to do so.

You can also make a monthly donation to the operating costs of the Yamhill Advocate, which will help me hire additional staff reporters. Click here to subscribe.

Please also note, there are MANY links to past articles in this article. If you are new to Yamhill Advocate, I suggest first reading this article in its entirety and then reading the associated links that source where information is from. Otherwise, you may go down a long rabbit hole. Read this article first so you understand the truth of Kristen Stoller and the Newberg Equity in Education group, and then you can go explore the other 45+ articles on this newspaper that are linked to in this one.

Kristen Stoller, a Leader of Newberg Equity in Education, Tries to Lie To Hide The Truth

For those who are new to my reporting on the activities of Newberg Equity in Education, Kristen Stoller is the owner of Chehalem Valley Dance Academy, which is located in downtown Newberg, which recently hosted a fundraiser where a high school student performed as a drag queen.

Stoller is also President of the Newberg Education Foundation and co-founder of Community Wellness Collective, a private mental health clinic, which as I have previously reported, I believe is being used to groom students in the Newberg school system. Stoller also describes herself in her bio on the Newberg Education Foundation as She’s a past  President of the Young Professionals of Yamhill Valley and an active member of the Chehalem Valley Chamber of Commerce, Newberg Early Bird Rotary, and Newberg Downtown Coalition.

More importantly, Stoller is one of the primary leaders of Newberg Equity in Education, a private Facebook group whose membership includes most of the Newberg public school teacher union, including its president and vice president, as well as other elected officials in Newberg City Council and public employees of the city.

No, she does not love Newberg or Dundee. She only loves herself. The ‘Better Together’ shirts are also not an officially recognized campaign for the Newberg Public Schools. It’s been created by her cult to confuse the public.

Her husband is real estate agent Francisco Stoller, of the family that owns Stoller Estate Winery in Dayton, Oregon. Francisco Stoller works for Earnest Real Estate.

Recently, Kristen Stoller has responded on her Instagram account to the video I have circulated of her declaring during a Yamhill County Democrats meeting that she has been using the Newberg public schools to indoctrinate children into her cult’s ideology as a means of changing the “voting culture” of the town, as well as declaring that her group’s objective is to “destroy Dave Brown” (the chairman of the Newberg school board).

I want you to see what she has said, so I can explain why she is lying.

However, as the evidence shows, Kristen Stoller is lying. This is just yet another attempt by her to obscure the activities of her cult. I believe she does wish harm toward Dave Brown, as she has devoted considerable resources and time toward his harassment.

I previously published hundreds of screenshots from the private Facebook group Kristen Stoller is an admin of, Newberg Equity in Education, which I regard as a kind of cult, that shows her cult organized harassment of School board directors Dave Brown, Brian Shannon, Renee Powell and Trevor DeHart. The harassment is, in my opinion, completely illegal. These illegal actions make the group, in my opinion, a kind of organized criminal conspiracy, which I have labeled a kind of pseudo-mafia. I will explain in detail toward the end of this article why that is the case.

The proof is overwhelming. For starters, this is the video that Kristen Stoller is responding to, which features her speaking at a recent Yamhill County Democrats meeting,

You can view the entire meeting video I have uploaded that features Stoller and many other members of the Newberg Equity in Education and Progressive Yamhill. The video reveals that Yamhill County Democrats are the ones behind several groups pretending to be ran by different people. The political party has been completely taken over by a cult, who is trying to use social media to deceive the public about their activities.

In my opinion, it is indisputable that Yamhill County Democrats has been taken over by a cult. As I have previously shown in the article, Part 2: Meet Progressive Yamhill, subsection Who Is Progressive Yamhill?, Megan Corvus is the Recording Secretary for the Yamhill County Democrats. She is also a self-admitted racist.

If you want to know more about the specific type of racism Corvus and the other members of the cult believe in, you can read What Every Newberg Resident Should Know About Recall Brian Shannon School Board Campaign for a detailed explanation. The short summary is that they believe in a continuation of the ideas of violent black separatist groups from the 1960s (such as the Black Panther Party and Weather Underground) that believe all “white people” are racist and owe a blood debt to “black” and “browns”, and this debt must be repaid by helping them dismantle our democracy to create racially segregated “utopias”. They attempt to obscure their activities by posing as “social activists” fighting “white supremacy”, which has been redefined to mean any “white person” who disagrees with their ideology. They recruit “white allies” into their cult to help them create the appearance of just being more mundane things, such as concerned parent groups, when actually, they are a cult.

Before she was the Recording Secretary for the Yamhill County Democrats, Megan Corvus was part of the “Indivisible movement”, which is a kind of political cult with quasi-religious ideologies built around Critical Race Theory and the fringe gender theories of John Money (which have been discredited because the truth came out in the 2000s that he lied about his research results). The group Progressive Yamhill seems to have been created specifically to organize the Indivisible cult sect in Yamhill County, Oregon. Newberg Equity in Education is one of the sub-groups that Progressive Yamhill operates at the city level in Yamhill County.

Here is a Facebook post where Megan Corvus gloats about how the cult’s efforts to take over the Yamhill County Democrats went very well,

(As a side note, I also highlighted the part where Megan Corvus admits that the Save Yamhill County PAC is actually operated by the Yamhill County Democrats political party, as I claimed in my prior article, Recall Brian Shannon and Lindsay Berschauer PACs Exposed, which provides yet more proof that the PAC filings are fraudulent).

Additionally, in reading her Instagram post, I find it ironic that Kristen Stoller accuses Dave Brown of coordinating with other school board members to break public meeting laws, when Stoller’s Facebook group broke these laws on a near daily basis for over a year and they did it intentionally with the goal of manipulating the public schools into a recruitment center for their cult, as I have shown in Evidence of Coordinated Efforts by NEEd Members to Manipulate Public Perception of Past School Board Meetings.

But the public meeting law violations is not the focus of this article. What I really want to do is provide evidence for why Kristen Stoller is a liar and expose her intentions toward Dave Brown and the other Newberg school board directors who are not members of her group.

So, while you read this next section, keep in mind that current Newberg board directors Rebeca Piros, Ines Pena and Brandy Penner are members of Newberg Equity in Education, as previously shown.

For now, I’m going to repost some previously published sections of Meet the Newberg, Oregon Mafia Led by Elected Officials and Other Community Leaders, by embedding some relevant screenshots in this article, to make it easier for people to find this information. By reading these screenshots you will understand Kristen Stoller is a pathological liar, and that she and everyone else in the cult, did in fact wish ill to Dave Brown, and the other school board directors Brian Shannon, Renee Powell and Trevor DeHart.

After all, that is why they organized a campaign of harassment to get them fired from jobs, try to break up Brian Shannon’s marriage and even harass them at the churches they attend.

Evidence of NEEd Members Stalking Newberg School Board Members

Newberg Equity in Education (NEEd) members have followed School board members around town to monitor them, as showcased in this thread from within their private Facebook group,

As can be seen, they have members who are following the school board directors to places they go, monitoring their activities and reporting them back to the group.

Evidence of Coordinated Efforts by NEEd to Intimidate School Board Members To Change Their Voters or Resign

The NEEd cult, and by extension all other parties involved, are violating several aspects of federal and state law by coordinated efforts to use intimidation on school board members to change their votes or to resign from the school board.

This is by either damaging their finances (interference in commerce) directly through getting them fired by their employers or having business ties ended, as well as other harassment such as actual real doxxing (such as sharing personal addresses and things, which I DO NOT do as it serves no useful purpose in publishing such personal info as home addresses).

Here is an example of how the group got Brian Shannon fired from his job.

First, let’s look at some public facing comments,

This is a screenshot from Kristen Stoller’s personal Facebook profile,

This conversation is in reference to Brian Shannon being fired as a project manager for Selectron Technologies.

While there is no law that says a company can decide to distance themselves from an individual who they believe are violating some company rule, I must ask Selectron Technologies what choice led to his termination? If his termination was due to his political opinions and actions as a public figure that are entirely legal, then this company has violated Oregon law. Using undue influence, including job loss threats with the intent to influence individuals’ voting, political activities, and contributions is unlawful in the state of Oregon, per ORS 260.665 Undue influence to affect registration, voting, candidacy, signing petitions.

Newberg’s own municipal code also has rules prohibiting this kind of thing,

9.15.020 Obstructing governmental administration.

A. No person shall intentionally obstruct, impair or hinder the administration of law or other governmental function by means of intimidation, force or physical interference or obstacle.

They are undeniably seeking to force publicly elected officials conducting administration of a municipal corporation (which is a school district is) using intimidation. This is a violation of the local municipal code.

State law Or. Rev. Stat. § 162.235 has a similar provision,

(1)A person commits the crime of obstructing governmental or judicial administration if the person:(a) Intentionally obstructs, impairs or hinders the administration of law or other governmental or judicial function by means of intimidation, force, physical or economic interference or obstacle;(b) With intent to defraud, engages in the business of or acts in the capacity of a notary public as defined in ORS 194.215 without having received a commission as a notary public from the Secretary of State; or(c) With intent to defraud, engages in the business of or acts in the capacity of an immigration consultant, as defined in ORS 9.280, in violation of ORS 9.160.(2) This section shall not apply to the obstruction of unlawful governmental or judicial action or interference with the making of an arrest.(3) Obstructing governmental or judicial administration is a Class A misdemeanor.

Also I think they are engaging in a collective coercion efforts against the school board members and those affiliated with them.

ORS 163.275 Coercion,

A person commits the crime of coercion when the person compels or induces another person to engage in conduct from which the other person has a legal right to abstain, or to abstain from engaging in conduct in which the other person has a legal right to engage, by means of instilling in the other person a fear that, if the other person refrains from the conduct compelled or induced or engages in conduct contrary to the compulsion or inducement, the actor or another will:

(a) Unlawfully cause physical injury to some person;

(b) Unlawfully cause physical injury to some animal;

(c) Unlawfully cause damage to property;

(d) Engage in conduct constituting a crime;

(e) Falsely accuse some person of a crime or cause criminal charges to be instituted against the person;

(f) Cause or continue a strike, boycott or other collective action injurious to some person’s business, except that such a threat is not deemed coercive when the act or omission compelled is for the benefit of the group in whose interest the actor purports to act;

(g) Testify falsely or provide false information or withhold testimony or information with respect to another’s legal claim or defense; or

(h) Unlawfully use or abuse the person’s position as a public servant by performing some act within or related to official duties, or by failing or refusing to perform an official duty, in such manner as to affect some person adversely.

(2) Coercion is a Class C felony. [1971 c.743 §102; 1983 c.546 §4; 1985 c.338 §1; 2007 c.71 §45; 2015 c.751 §1]

Furthermore, I believe violations of federal law have also been committed, such as sections of Title 52 – VOTING AND ELECTIONS,

(b) Intimidation, threats, or coercion

No person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for voting or attempting to vote, or intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for urging or aiding any person to vote or attempt to vote, or intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for exercising any powers or duties under section 10302(a), 10305, 10306, or 10308(e) of this title or section 1973d or 1973g of title 42.1

I also believe provisions of chapter 29 of title 18, United States Code, relating to elections and political activities have been violated, 18 U.S. Code § 594 – Intimidation of voters.

As for Oregon State law,

ORS 260.575 Use of threats and intimidation for purpose of extorting money

No person, for any consideration, shall:

Offer, propose, threaten or attempt to sell, hinder or delay any part of an initiative, referendum or recall petition.

Offer, propose or threaten to desist from beginning, promoting, circulating, or soliciting signatures to, any initiative, referendum or recall petition.

Offer, propose, attempt or threaten in any manner to use an initiative, referendum or recall petition or any power of promotion or opposition concerning such petition for extortion, blackmail or private intimidation of any person. [Formerly 254.580]

As you can see, while the law is titled as being about extortion it actually prohibits several kinds of actions. This is the importance of actually reading the entire sections of the laws instead of just skimming their titles.

For full context of the NEEd activities about intimidation of elected school board officials, here is the entire post from Kristen Stoller’s Facebook profile that shows everyone who publicly cheered for Brian Shannon’s firing,

This is of course only what was said publicly by NEEd members on Kristen Stoller’s public Facebook profile.

Kristen Stoller’s public profile comments are not enough to condemn them, so let’s look at messages from WITHIN their private Facebook group, Newberg Equity in Education,

As you can see, there is some initial resistance to the idea of using intimidation and harassment, which quickly disappears when more prominent members of the mafia suggests it is virtuous to engage in illegal activity.

By the way, from the list of people who ‘liked’ the post asking for personal information about the school board members so they could organize a boycott,

Lu Pita AKA Guadalupe Martinez Zapata, Vice-Chair of the Oregon Department of Education, also liked this post organizing the harassment of the school board members. (Note: Proof that this is who the poster is can be viewed here).

Here is another thread from within the NEEd group talking about getting Brian Shannon fired.

Next, here is a post where they plotted to harass School board Chair Dave Brown and even try to get his students to share some kind of dirt the NEEd group can use to intimidate him with,

The group has many different ideas on how to intimidate school board members through the collection of personal information, such as this oddball one involving tracking down what churches they go to, which obviously serves no legitimate purpose other than to harass them and try to isolate them from the community as a form of intimidation.

Here is Kristen Stoller herself trying to find out what church people go to who spoke in support of the ban at a recent school board meeting, and see if they also go to the same church Dave Brown attends.

Here is a followup post where NEEd members claim to know for sure that Brian Shannon was fired for his board vote as a result of the NEEd members’ harassment of his employer, which as I previously explained, is illegal.

In reading Heidi Schneiter Pender’s comments, you should really consider the source. I doubt the group that organized the intimidation that led to his firing is now suddenly wanting to “protect his family'”.

This is why these type of psychos are called virtue signalers. They only care about appearing virtuous and they don’t believe in being virtuous. You can’t do these things to people in America just because you don’t like their vote. This is unmistakably voter intimidation of an elected official who represents other voters.

Here is another thread where the NEEd group members salivate at the mouth upon hearing rumors that their coordinated harassment and intimidation against Brian Shannon might have caused problems in his marriage, and are looking to exploit it for their political gain,

So, these psychopaths are both overjoyed at the idea that they might be able to exploit a problem in Brian Shannon’s marriage resulting from the fallout of the NEEd group’s coordinated harassment of anyone associated with him, and they also strategize how to take advantage of the situation to isolate Brian Shannon from his wife and children under the false guise of “support” and “comfort” to them.

I believe at this point in the article it’s beyond contestation that NEEd is breaking laws. For furthering my argument, recently the Department of Justice put out the following statement about intimidation and harassment of elected school board officials. The statement is related to the rise of “cancel culture” harassment against elected officials, such as school board members,

Justice Department Addresses Violent Threats Against School Officials and Teachers

At this time I want the public to know that I have already reported the members of NEEd to the FBI.

I don’t know if you need more evidence of how evil these people are, but let’s keep going since there is so much more of it.

Since I originally published these screenshots, a lawsuit has been filed by Newberg public school board directors Dave Brown, Renee Powell, Brian Shannon and Trevor DeHart against Debbie Tofte, Katherine Barnett, AJ Schwanz and Tamara Brookfield, who are members of Newberg Equity in Education.

However, as you can see by the screenshots I have posted, far more people were involved in this harassment.

The NEEd group engages in illegal activity that is prohibited by both state and federal laws to reward businesses for publicly pressuring elected officials to vote or resign.

Examples of this from messages within the NEED mafia group,

Pollinate Flowers is a business in town that has been active in the political campaign to recall Brian Shannon.

Here is more evidence for the NEEd mob providing financial rewards to businesses that help them harass school board members, such as Renee Powell.

This conversation is evidence the NEEd group has engaged in extortion through fear.

As previously mentioned, the business owner of Potters Vineyard told Renee Powell in an email that she was ending the business relationship with Powell due to fear of the NEEd mob. The mob then gave financial benefit (purchasing products) to Potters Vineyard for ending the business relationship. What the mob has done is therefore a crime, as previously mentioned. I will talk more specifically about the full gravity of this situation in the RICO section of this article.

Why I Call the Newberg Equity in Education Group A “Mafia”

I have previously shown the coordinated harassment and coercion that the NEEd group is organizing against school board members Dave Brown, Brian Shannon, Trevor DeHart and Rene Powell, in a desire to force them to resign or change their votes.

Let’s now talk about how this, when all of the evidence I have shown so far is also considered, makes this so much more than just a group of disgruntled teachers and parents. I believe their activities make them an organized criminal ring, ie. a mafia.

No, I’m not saying they are part of the Italian mob. I am talking about the facts their activities violate a federal law that was expressly designed to stop organized crime rings, which is what a mafia is.

I am willing to go on record to suggest everything I have shown so far is evidence for violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), which was specifically created to arrest members of mafias. Let me explain my reasoning.

According to CRM 101-199,

It is unlawful for anyone employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c) (West 1984). The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) was passed by Congress with the declared purpose of seeking to eradicate organized crime in the United States. Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 26-27, 104 S. Ct. 296, 302-303, 78 L. Ed. 2d 17 (1983); United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576, 589, 101 S. Ct. 2524, 2532, 69 L. Ed. 2d 246 (1981). A violation of Section 1962(c), requires (1) conduct (2) of an enterprise (3) through a pattern (4) of racketeering activity. Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., 473 U.S. 479, 496, 105 S. Ct. 3275, 3285, 87 L. Ed. 2d 346 (1985).

A more expansive view holds that in order to be found guilty of violating the RICO statute, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) that an enterprise existed; (2) that the enterprise affected interstate commerce; (3) that the defendant was associated with or employed by the enterprise; (4) that the defendant engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity; and (5) that the defendant conducted or participated in the conduct of the enterprise through that pattern of racketeering activity through the commission of at least two acts of racketeering activity as set forth in the indictment. United States v. Phillips, 664 F. 2d 971, 1011 (5th Cir. Unit B Dec. 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136, 102 S. Ct. 1265, 73 L. Ed. 2d 1354 (1982).

An “enterprise” is defined as including any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity. 18 U.S.C.A. §  1961(4) (West 1984). Many courts have noted that Congress mandated a liberal construction of the RICO statute in order to effectuate its remedial purposes by holding that the term “enterprise” has an expansive statutory definition. United States v. Delano, 825 F. Supp. 534, 538-39 (W.D.N.Y. 1993), aff’d in part, rev’d in part, 55 F. 3d 720 (2d Cir. 1995), cases cited therein.

The courts have held that due to the Commerce Clause, any act of commerce applies for creating a RICO case and it does not require the commerce acts involve inter-state transactions or travel. Commerce need only be impacted slightly or de minimis

The important thing is the racketing, which in this case is extortion by fear against businesses that employ or have financial relationships with Newberg school board members.

18 U.S. Code § 1951 – Interference with commerce by threats or violence

Whoever in any way or degree obstructs, delays, or affects commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in commerce, by robbery or extortion or attempts or conspires so to do, or commits or threatens physical violence to any person or property in furtherance of a plan or purpose to do anything in violation of this section shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.(b) As used in this section—

(1) The term “robbery” means the unlawful taking or obtaining of personal property from the person or in the presence of another, against his will, by means of actual or threatened force, or violence, or fear of injury, immediate or future, to his person or property, or property in his custody or possession, or the person or property of a relative or member of his family or of anyone in his company at the time of the taking or obtaining.

(2) The term “extortion” means the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right.

(3) The term “commerce” means commerce within the District of Columbia, or any Territory or Possession of the United States; all commerce between any point in a State, Territory, Possession, or the District of Columbia and any point outside thereof; all commerce between points within the same State through any place outside such State; and all other commerce over which the United States has jurisdiction.

I’ve bolded the parts that are applicable in these kinds of organized harassment campaigns by a union against an elected official.

“Commerce”, due to the Commerce Clause, just means any time money is involved, since money is the exclusive property of the Federal government in America. It’s a long winded legalese way of saying any crime involving a financial or monetary component.

The definitions of robbery or extortion could be applicable either way in this case, but extortion is most likely what the feds will go with, I assume. Note that the word “obtain” in this context of how RICO law is used just means removed from someone else. It doesn’t mean they have to get his money or property for it to be applicable; they do not. They simply have to deprive him of what he would have if they had not engaged in any unlawful content, such as their organized intimidation against the elected official due to his voting.

Normally, “cancel culture” tactics can be considered legal IF done under certain circumstances. For example, a journalistic reporting editorial such as this one, is not considered illegal because I am reporting on a matter of public interest. If someone else loses their job because of my report, it’s not my legal fault, because my goal is to report truth and if they cannot be employed when true facts are known that is on them not me.

This situation is different. This is a coordinated harassment and intimidation campaign by a teacher union and their supporters, against an elected public official to coerce him into changing his votes or to resign from his elected position, and who due to his role as a school board member also impacts their jobs. This is 100% illegal to do. Our democratic process can’t endure if this was normal political campaigning behavior for unions.

As an example, as a consequences of the NEEd group’s illegal activity, School board member Brian Shannon lost his job and School board member Renee Powell had her merchandise removed from a winery showroom store, which negatively impacts their finances. Then when members of NEEd learned Powell’s relationship had ended with the winery via extortion by fear, members rewarded that winery with patronage,

Because this is organized extortion by fear using an actual labor union and its members (Newberg Education Association, whose leaders are all key members of the NEEd group, and that RICO was designed to deal with organized crime within labor unions) and that when the extortion is successful the members then literally say they will now provide money (patronage) to the business for having ended ties to the public official, I believe this is a clear case where RICO has been violated.

Here is another thread in the NEEd group that shows the NEEd group members are responsible for the ending of the business relationship between an elected official (Renee Powell) and a private company, using extortion by fear,

Make no mistake; the business owners stated feelings to the NEEd members about why they ended the relationship does not change that the NEEd members goal in informing the winery and other businesses which Powell had a relationship, was in a desire to imply, “if you don’t remove the products we won’t buy your items and may start other harassment against you like we are doing to Powell“. They threatened the business owners with not only a boycott, but further harassment.

And there is nothing in the NEEd group communications that implies they wouldn’t harass and boycott a company that refused to remove Powell’s products in retaliation for her vote going a way she didn’t like. After all, they are harassing the board members. If they are willing to organize harassment of elected officials, who won’t they harass?

Besides, I was able to obtain the actual emails between the winery showroom owner and Powell that shows it was due to intimidation and fear that the merchandise was removed,

As you can see, the owner Sandy of the showroom has given fear and intimidation by the NEED mob as the reason she removed Powell’s merchandise.

I believe this is sufficient evidence to show the NEEd group is in fact a mafia that used organized intimidation to create fear to harass an elected official, and then as an organized group they financially rewarded the business for ending ties with the elected official. That meets the federal law requirement for extortion and coercion, and this is one of the requirements for RICO.

The NEEd group’s membership consists of an actual labor union using intimidation to influence and pressure politicians through coercion and intimidation of other businesses to severe ties, and then the group gives financial rewards for ending those ties. That’s what the mafia did and it is illegal. Therefore, I believe it is correct to call NEEd a mafia and claim it has violated RICO.

As an aside, within their member lists is Kim Bibbee Heater who is the current HR director for the Allison, where as discussed by the NEEd mafia, the school board director Renee Powell has /had merchandise. The NEEd mafia has sought to have Powell’s relationship with the Allison ended, too.

Now, personally, after spending many hours reading through their messages (and screenshotting almost all of them, by the way) about the harassment of elected officials, I believe the motivation of the NEEd mafia group is to pressure the targets of their harassment to resign from the school board so that their preferred candidates, such as Tai Harden-Moore, can take office (I have provided the evidence for this claim in What Every Newberg Resident Should Know About Recall Brian Shannon School Board Campaign, subsection Who Do The Organizers of Recall Brian Shannon Want To Replace Him With?)

If the NEEd group is successful in removing the school board directors who are not part of their cult, they will be able to have full control over the town, as presently they already have members making up most of the Newberg city government and have several members on the school board already (Piros, Ines and Penner), as I have shown in Part 2: Meet Progressive Yamhill, the Parent Group of the NEEd Mafia Seizing Control of the County, subsection List of Identified Elected Politicians and Other Key Political Activists).

The NEEd mafia cult takeover of the town of Newberg will be complete if they can get Rene Powell, Brian Shannon, Trevor DeHart and Dave Brown to resign from the school board through intimidation tactics. I can prove this with their own postings from when Tai Harden-Moore ran for office; the NEEd group collectively chose to support her, just as they did other candidates for government positions in Newberg such as Bryce Coefield, as shown in The Full List of NEEd Mafia Members

The group desperately wants to control the town of Newberg and the members of the group are eager to prove their loyalty by doing whatever is necessary to be part of this takeover. In fact, they are so desperate to prove this loyalty that any time one of the leaders makes a request, no matter how absurd, they jump at it. Case in point, when Lydia Keuler (who is married to the senior accountant for the City of Newberg) an admin of the group asks for them to spam report my previous article exposing Tai Harden-Moore they go to great lengths to virtue signal and prove their loyalty.

This, of course, is their most fatal flaw as an organized criminal group. These declarations of loyalty by members of the group is what allows their crimes to become a RICO case. RICO allows ALL members of an organization to be penalized for the criminal actions of ANY OTHER MEMBER of the group. If you can be proven to be loyal to the mafia group, you are subject to penalties under RICO.

These guys are just incredibly dumber than past gangsters, for organizing their racketeering on freakin Facebook, where the evidence can be easily recovered.

Also, the group is used to promote businesses such as Social Goods and the Pollinate flower shop.

As the group is literally part of the union and it is engaged in political activity, I am sure the group also being used to sell commercial services and products is illegal. The feds will need to piece together how that all fits together though.

What is most certainly true is that companies like Pollinate Flowers and their owners are deeply intertwined with the conspiracy,

They seem to believe they can mask and obscure their activities by using their businesses, and the general public will be none the wiser, even if they openly post on Facebook groups.

But now you can see the truth.

The Cult’s Comments During the School Board Meeting Where Superintendent Joe Morelock Was Terminated

I previously reported on Morelock’s termination and provided reasons for why he should have been fired.

The cult members are completely hostile to the school board members who are not in their cult, as they believe themselves to be waging a kind of holy crusade against the officials. Just see for yourself how insane they are, by reading their comments from the live-stream chat on the Recall Brian Shannon page, where the cult members watched the board meeting where Morelock was terminated.

As a note for reading this, the way Facebook chat works, the newest comments are posted to the bottom of the page, so to read comments in chronological order, you have to read from the bottom of the chat box to the top in every photo I show here.

You’ll also notice board members names abbreviated, such as “BS” for Brian Shannon and “DB” for Dave Brown. Keep that in mind. “CM” is obviously me.

Another thing to know is that every time you see a post by “Recall Brian Shannon”, it is Andrew Gallagher, Vice President of the Newberg Education Association teacher union, who is making these posts (he has been witnessed accidentally posting to the Page using his personal profile, deleting the message, and then reposting it as the Page. So, I strongly believe it’s him.)

Also for context, you can watch the relevant video section where the comments were made by clicking to see this YouTube video of the November 9th school board meeting. I suggest reading the comments first though, which I have embedded below.

(Just a note, the “Send emails” thing is a paper terrorism tactic the group employs to harass Dave Brown. Because he’s required to respond to all emails he receives, they bombard his inbox with emails constantly as a means of harassing him. I have an upcoming article about this coming soon, based on documents I received as part of a public records request)

(I couldn’t help myself, lol)

(all the people who liked Erin McCarthy’s comment to me, by the way)

And as you can see by Amanda Rice Bayha’s comments, they are comfortable alking about exploiting the students to serve the agenda of the teacher union, in violation of the law, recruiting them into assisting the labor union by abusing their positions of authority over them.

I think that’s enough to counter the attempt by Kristen Stoller to “re-frame” what she is doing as a leader of the Newberg Equity in Education cult. By now you should see she is a pathological liar and that her entire group harbors nothing but evil intentions for not only school board director Dave Brown, but all the residents of Newberg who stand in the way of her cult’s agenda.

Also, there is the whole indoctrination of children into fringe gender pseudo-science stuff, which you can read about in my last published article, Newberg Schools Indoctrinate Children Into Pseudoscience Designed to Change Children’s Sexual Identity, because Kristen Stoller is deeply involved with it.

If you’ve made it this far, I highly suggest you read that article.

- Advertisement -
Subscribe to Yamhill Advocate
Carey Martell
Carey Martell
Publisher and editor for Yamhill Advocate. Digital media entrepreneur. Born and raised in Newberg, Oregon. US Army Veteran.


Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kerry Wolfe

Thank you , Carey !! Keep up the good work !!


Wow. All of Newberg should read this before they prematurely vote to recall Brian Shannon.

I think many people will change their minds.
Thanks, Carey

- Advertisment -
Subscribe to Yamhill Advocate

Latest News

Subscribe to Yamhill Advocate

Recent Comments

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x